![]() On the other hand, EL brings a lot of new ideas : That being said, there's a lot of strategy involved in the combats. And of course the devs are going to try and sell shitty dlcs. The hero system is not great, and so is the science one. I also think the game is rather ugly for a 2014 game. It has multiple races, that are almost all the same, no gameplay difference. I have bought both the day they were released : I uninstalled aow3 after 2 weeks because it was worse than heroes of might and magic 3-4 on every point, and still play Endless Legend a lot.Īow3 isn't innovative in any way, it's just an aow that looks better than the others. ![]() Even saying that I do think Endless Legend has better Race design and world design. The first game is by far the best, but the next expansion does seem really promising. In my opinion AOW 3 is not the best of the series. In AOW the races really do not seem that much different besides appearance but unlike the previous games its about the classes. Plus there is an another expansion coming soon for AOW that adds a new race from the previous games and a new class the necromancer. One thing AOW has that Endless legend does not have is a campaign and they are actually pretty good (especially if you know about the lore of AOW). If you really enjoy combat AOW is for you but if you enjoy the diplomacy or city building for CIV than get Endless legend. Endless Legend seems actually like a mix of AOW and Civ. I'm a long time Age of Wonders fan and I really love the series but AOW is really just about the combat. This subreddit is pretty biased but I found both games very enjoyable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |